Re: about topN within one day / toptalkers and AS

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Subject: Re: about topN within one day / toptalkers and AS
From: Michael Hare (michael.hare@doit.wisc.edu)
Date: Wed Sep 26 2001 - 10:58:32 CDT

All-

I work in the same group as Dave Plonka, and also work for WiscNet, which 
is Wisconsin's statewide educational network.   I'm running a heavily 
modified version of flowscan that is collecting sampled flows from two 
junipers and one GSR; currently my AS stuff is being calculated only from 
one of our BGP tables; I'm working on fixing this as well.

I've hacked FlowScan to take care of the sampling (Dave is working on a 
more formal version destined for release), and I've also added code that, 
every 5 minutes, updates a few mySQL tables with AS and per host traffic 
statistics; I summarize this information at the end of each day.

So not only do we have AS information for every AS out there (good for 
making peering decisions), I can also supply a toptalkers list, per subnet, 
for each of WiscNet's 500+ institutions, getting around the dance of taking 
the top 25 of "top 25 5 minute samples" (I had written scripts to do this 
as well)..  In summary: I get can a true daily toptalkers.

I'm doing 1/192 packet sampling, so I'm only doing 600 flows per second 
during peak on a dual p3 1Ghz.  Updating ~ 30000 mysql rows from within 
FlowScan barely affects my performance.

-Michael

At 04:28 PM 9/26/2001 +0200, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Eric Gauthier wrote:
>
> > Let me give you an example.  Lets say that you move a constant 2.4Mbps
> > worth of traffic to AS xxx.  Lets also say that, on average, you move
> > 1.5Mbps to AS yyy and 1.5 Mbps of traffic to AS zzz.  Lets also say
> > that there are 9 other AS's who you move more than 2 Mbps to.
> >
> > Lets say that, in a particular 5 minute interval, the traffic to AS yyy
> > bursts up to 2.5 Mbps while AS zzz is at 1.0 Mbps and AS xxx stays at their
> > constant 2.4Mbps.  Then, AS yyy becomes the 10th loudest speaker,
> > ends up at the bottom of the table, and AS xxx isn't listed.  Now,
> > lets say in the 2nd 5 minute interval, AS yyy drops down to moving only
> > about 1.0 Mbps but AS zzz bursts up to 2.5 Mbps.  Again, AS zzz becomes
> > the 10th loudest speaker, ends up at the bottom of the table, and AS xxx
> > isn't listed.  If this alternated back and forth, then AS xxx would never
> > show up in the table but AS yyy and AS zzz would show up in alternating
> > tables.  When you aggregate your information, then you'll have entries
> > for AS yyy and AS zzz but nothing for AS xxx - even though the average
> > throughput for AS xxx is 2.4 Mbps, for AS yyy is 1.75 Mbps, and for
> > AS zzz is 1.75 Mbps.
> >
> > Doing the aggregation like this is a nice way to get an idea of what's
> > going on, but it should be taken with a large grain of salt.
>
>I haven't checked it exactly (too much zzzzz ;-) ) but I agree.
>There is one solution: the bigger N in TopN - the better precision.
>
>--
>Grzegorz Janoszka,  Onet.pl S.A.
>
>
>--
>Help        mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say "help" in message body
>Unsubscribe mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say
>"unsubscribe flowscan" in message body
>Archive     http://net.doit.wisc.edu/~plonka/list/flowscan/archive/

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Michael Hare
UW-Madison Network Engineering
WiscNet Network Engineering
My phone: 608-262-5236
24-Hour NOC: 608-263-4188
WiscNet: 608-265-6761


--
Help        mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say "help" in message body
Unsubscribe mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say
"unsubscribe flowscan" in message body
Archive     http://net.doit.wisc.edu/~plonka/list/flowscan/archive/

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Sep 26 2001 - 12:48:35 CDT