Subject: (no subject)
From: Deaton, James (jed@onenet.net)
Date: Thu Sep 13 2001 - 09:01:22 CDT
A bit ago there was a short exchange explaining the cause of the 'unidentified' count when dealing with the origin AS tables. I am having a similar issue and have checked that the destination addresses that result in increasing this count are in fact in the BGP route table. I'm hoping to spend some time to track this down but am curious if anyone else may know the cause. It appears, from a brief debug session, that all the addresses that aren't correctly identified are associated the AS serviced by a single ATM link that we receive from one of our providers. All other ASs appear to be classified appropriately. Of course, this is based on a very cursory check. -- Help mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say "help" in message body Unsubscribe mailto:majordomo@net.doit.wisc.edu and say "unsubscribe flowscan" in message body Archive http://net.doit.wisc.edu/~plonka/list/flowscan/archive/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Sep 13 2001 - 09:07:30 CDT